Fila m100 vs RB tempest 100 qui est plus confortable?

[petabyte]

Hi. First of all, sorry!!, i don't speak French, and only a little of English, but the question is easy and short.
About Fila M100 and rollerblade tempest 100 which one is more comfortable or wide?
Which boot is more a "fitness boot"?
I think f100 have better boot, (more expensive), but at least, i will decide my buying for the comfort, (they are my first non fitness skates, i have now a seba gt, and i think they will be more hard and tight than my seba gt, but...which ones will be less?


Thanks and sorry again.

And now...a liitle of google translator...

Salut. Tout d'abord, désolé!, Je ne parle pas français, et seulement un peu d'anglais, mais la question est facile et court.
A propos de Fila M100 et roller tempête 100 lequel est le plus confortable ou large?
Quels démarrage est plus une "botte de fitness"?
Je pense avoir un meilleur démarrage F100, (plus cher), mais au moins, je vais décider de mon achat pour le confort, (ils sont mes premiers patins de fitness non, j'ai maintenant une GT Seba, et je pense qu'ils seront plus durs et serrées que mes seba GT, mais ... ceux qui seront de moins?

[XSFred]

They are designed for different feet :
- Fila M100 is better for narrow feet
- Tempest 100 fits wider, flatter feet.

Both are excellent skates, meant for long distances, which translates into a good mix between comfort and speed.

[petabyte]

ok!, thanks a lot. i will go for the tempest. the wider boot and the price wins! against carbon boot. i hope the fibertech will do enought resistant boot.
i'm not worried about weight or rigidity, but the durability/resistance worry me.